| October 2026 · Issue 3 | |
| Turns out agency confidence rebounded and the number of leaders who say their agency needs big changes went up at the same time. | |
| Agency Core has now run three times — 2022, 2025 and 2026 — and ten statements have been asked in every wave. Two of them are optimism about the agency’s own opportunities, and agreement that the agency needs to make big changes. | |
|
What you would expect is that those two lines run in opposite directions. Leaders who feel good about the future should be the ones who feel least need to overhaul anything; leaders who think the model is broken should be the gloomy ones. What the data says is that both went up. Confidence recovered some of the ground it lost in 2025, and the share saying their agency has to make big changes went up anyway — as it has in every wave. | |
| |
|
The comfortable reading is that the industry took its knock in 2025 and is coming back. The uncomfortable one is that a third of agency leaders now say the thing they run needs to be substantially different, and that share has doubled since 2022 without ever pausing. Both can be true at once, and I think they are. Belief that there is opportunity out there has come back. Confidence in the machine that is supposed to go and get it has not, and that is a far more specific problem than a bad mood — which is good news, because specific problems have moving parts you can reach. Pipeline has been the number one challenge in every wave of this study — 67% name it this year. Half now also name demonstrating their competitive advantage, and half name getting clients to pay what they are worth. | |
| |
| |
| Or take the 2-minute quiz — optimism is back at 53%, but see if you can place where it sat when Agency Core started tracking this in 2022. | |
| Susan |
I write with AI as my co-author. The ideas, the advice and the final read are mine.
Get the next one One surprising finding from our research, every couple of weeks. If a study turns up nothing that contradicts what agency leaders already assume, we skip the issue. |



Leave a Reply